Compare the cost of different building types based on UK market rates. Enter the building area to see the total construction cost for each type.
Note: Costs based on UK market rates from the article. Actual costs may vary based on location, design complexity, and other factors.
When you hear “Type 5 Building Construction is a classification that relies on solid, non‑combustible walls to carry the building’s structural load,” you instantly know you’re dealing with the toughest of the five traditional building types. Unlike wood‑frame or steel‑frame approaches, every floor, roof and façade sits on thick masonry or concrete walls, which act like the building’s spine.
In the UK, builders and designers refer to this system when fire safety and durability are top priorities. Below we break down what Type5 really means, how it stacks up against the other four types, and when you should choose it for your next project.
Type5 building construction is defined as a system where load‑bearing walls are made of concrete, reinforced masonry, or similar non‑combustible materials. These walls support all vertical loads - floors, roofs, and even lateral forces like wind - without the need for an internal steel or timber frame.
Key attributes include:
To appreciate Type5’s strengths, it helps to see it next to the other four classifications that the UK Building Control Service uses.
Type 1 Building Construction relies on wood‑frame walls, making it the most combustible option. It’s common for low‑rise residential houses.
Type 2 Building Construction uses non‑combustible materials for the exterior walls but still depends on a timber or steel frame for structural support. Think of many mid‑rise apartments.
Type 3 Building Construction features non‑combustible exterior walls with a steel or concrete frame; interior walls may be lightweight. It’s typical for office blocks.
Type 4 Building Construction uses a steel frame with non‑combustible exterior walls, often seen in warehouses.
Compared with these, Type5 eliminates the internal frame entirely - the walls themselves are the structure. This results in superior fire performance and fewer moving parts, but it also means heavier foundations and more rigorous engineering checks.
The heart of Type5 is its load‑bearing walls, which can be built using several methods:
Because the walls bear the load, the foundation must be sized accordingly. Typical foundations are reinforced concrete strip or raft slabs, designed to spread the wall loads over a larger soil footprint.
Every construction system has trade‑offs. Here’s a quick look at what makes Type5 attractive and where it might fall short.
Feature | Type1 | Type2 | Type3 | Type4 | Type5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary structural system | Timber frame | Timber/Steel frame + non‑combustible exterior | Steel or concrete frame | Steel frame | Non‑combustible load‑bearing walls |
Fire rating (walls) | 30min | 1‑hour | 2‑hour | 2‑hour | 2‑hour+ (often 3‑hour) |
Typical cost (per m²) | £1,200 | £1,400 | £1,700 | £1,800 | £2,200 |
Common use | Detached houses | Low‑rise flats | Mid‑rise offices | Industrial warehouses | High‑rise apartments, hospitals, schools |
Structural weight | Low | Medium | Medium‑high | Medium‑high | High |
**Pros**:
**Cons**:
Because of its fire safety and robustness, Type5 is the go‑to choice for:
One notable example is the new student accommodation at Manchester’s Campus One development, which uses reinforced concrete load‑bearing walls to meet the required 3‑hour fire rating while delivering a sleek, minimalist façade.
Any Type5 project must align with several parts of the Building Regulations:
Working with a chartered structural engineer early on can help navigate these requirements and avoid costly redesigns.
If most answers line up, Type5 could be the safest, most enduring choice.
When moving from concept to construction, keep these tips in mind:
Skipping any of these steps often leads to costly rework or compliance issues.
Because the walls themselves are made of non‑combustible concrete or reinforced masonry, they act as a continuous fire barrier. The mass of the material also slows heat transfer, giving occupants more safe evacuation time.
It’s possible, but it defeats the purpose of pure load‑bearing walls and adds complexity. If extra spans or large open spaces are needed, many designers switch to a hybrid system, keeping the walls for fire protection while using steel beams for longer spans.
It can be, but the higher material and foundation costs usually make timber or Type2 more economical for small houses. Type5 shines in multi‑storey blocks where fire safety and durability outweigh the extra expense.
Wall pours and curing add days to the schedule. A typical 5‑storey block may take 2‑3 weeks longer than a comparable Type3 steel‑frame building, largely due to concrete work and foundation reinforcement.
External thermal insulation systems (ETICS) are popular, as they don’t compromise the structural wall. Interior rigid board insulation can also be used, but care must be taken to avoid thermal bridges at wall junctions.
Write a comment